Relevant Publications

Below you will find a list of relevant publications in the field of metaphilosophy. This list does not claim to be complete, but serves as an introduction and provides information about some new relevant publications after the year 2000. You are welcome to inform us about new publications via info@cmphr.one.

2024

Book chapters

Minkin, D. (2024). Metaphilosophie. In: Minkin, D. Theoretische Philosophie I. utb., 29-48.

Lewin, M. (2024). Philosophie, Geschichte der Philosophie und Zukunft der Philosophie. In: Lewin, M. (Hg.), Klassische Deutsche Philosophie: Wege in die Zukunft, Paderborn: Brill/mentis, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.30965/9783969753002_002.

Lewin, M. (2024). Philosophie zwischen Begriffsanalyse, Begriffsbildung, ‚Begriffsdichtung‘ und ‚Begriffsengineering‘. Wie die ‚Wortanalyse‘ das Vagheitsproblem lösen kann. In: Lewin, M. (Hg.), Klassische Deutsche Philosophie: Wege in die Zukunft, Paderborn: Brill/mentis, 65-89. https://doi.org/10.30965/9783969753002_005.

Reviews

Arnold, T. (2024). Metaphilosophische Objektwahl und Kritik der kritischen Kriterien – Neue Literatur zur Philosophie der Philosophie. Philosophische Rundschau 71/1. https://doi.org/10.1628/phr-2024-0007.

Arnold, T. (2024). Metaphilosophische Objektwahl und Kritik der kritischen Kriterien – Neue Literatur zur Philosophie der Philosophie – Teil 2. Philosophische Rundschau 71/2. https://doi.org/10.1628/phr-2024-0012.

2023

Books

Lewin, Michael. Metaphilosophie als einheitliche Disziplin, Berlin: Springer/Metzler, 2023. Link

Journal Issues

Kant and Metaphilosophy. Edited by Michael Lewin. Kantian Journal, Vol. 42. №3. 2023. Link.

Articles 

Dellsén, F., Lawler, I, Norton, J. (forthcoming). Would disagreement undermine progress? Journal of Philosophy.

Horvath, J., Ziółkowski A., Wiegmann A., und Machery E., (2023). Truetemp Cooled Down: The Stability of Truetemp Intuitions. Synthese, 201, pp. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04182-7

Horvath, J., Wiegmann, A. (2023). Arguing About Thought Experiments. Synthese 201(6), pp. 217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04055-z

Edition. Horvath, J., Koch, S., Titelbaum, M. G. (forthcoming). Methods in Analytic Philosophy: A Primer and Guide. PhilPapers Foundation.

Koch, S., Löhr, G., Pinder, M.  (forthcoming). Recent work in the theory of conceptual engineering. Analysis.

Koch, S. (forthcoming). The anti-conceptual engineering argument and the problem of implementation. American Philosophical Quarterly.

Lewin, M. and Williamson, T., 2023. Kant and Analysis. Kantian Journal 42(3), pp. 49-73. http://dx.doi:10.5922/0207-6918-2023-3-3 

Minkin, D., 2023. Kant als metaphilosophischer Skeptizist? Kantian Journal 42(3), pp. 97-129. http://dx.doi:10.5922/0207-6918-2023-3-5

Lewin, M., Lewin, P. 2023. Shan, Yafeng, ed. 2022, New Directions in Metaphilosophy. Metaphilosophy 53 (2-3). pp. 153-361. Aisthesis. Pratiche, linguaggi e saperi dell’estetico 16(1), pp. 195-198. https://doi.org/10.36253/Aisthesis-1004

Book chapters

Horvath, J. (forthcoming). On the Role of Intuitions in Experimental Philosophy. In: Bauer, A. M., Kornmesser, S. (Hg.). The Compact Compendium of Experimental Philosophy. Berlin / Boston, Mass.: Walter de Gruyter, im Erscheinen.

Horvath, J. (2023). Gettier’s Thought Experiments. In: Vaidya, A., Prelevič, D. (Hg.). Epistemology of Modality and Philosophical Methodology. London: Routledge.Mit Replik von Williamson T. “Horvath on Gettier’s Thought Experiments” (ebd.).

Koch, S.,Brisen, J. (forthcoming). Conceptual Infrastructure and Conceptual Engineering. Konstanz University Press.

2022

Books

Schmid, Jelscha. The Methods of Metaphilosophy, Klostermann, 2022. Link

Williamson, Timothy. The Philosophy of Philosophy, Wiley/Blackwell, 2022. 2nd Edition. Link.

Journal Issues

Reconstructivists not dead: Methodologies in the history of early modern philosophy. Edited by Szalai, J.   Toth, O. Hungarian Philosophical Review, 1. 2022. 

Feminist Metaphilosophy. Edited by V. Bortolami and G. Miolli. Verifiche, Vol. 2, 2022. 

Articles 

Dellsén, F., Lawler, I, Norton, J. (2022). Thinking about progress: From science to philosophy. Noûs 56(4), 814-840.

Horvath, J. (2022). Mischaracterization Reconsidered. Inquiry, 2022.

Horvath, J. Wiegmann, A. (2022). Intuitive Expertise in Moral Judgments. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 100(2), pp. 342–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2021.1890162

Koch, S., Wiegmann, A. (2022). Folk intuitions about reference change and the causal theory of reference. Ergo 8 (25).  doi: 10.31234/osf.io/v8z3d

Koch, S., Gustavo Isaac, M., Neftd, R. (2022). Conceptual engineering: A road map to practice. Philosophy Compass 17 (10). https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12879

Koch, S., Gustavo Isaac, M. (2022). Foundational issues in conceptual engineering: Introduction and overview. Inquiry (1–9) (online first). https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2022.2028230

Williamson, T., Sunday-Grève, S. (2022). Philosophy and Common Sense 2: Cultivating Curiosity. The Philosophers’ Magazine 96, pp. 24-30. 

Williamson, T., Sunday-Grève, S. (2022). Philosophy and Common Sense 3: Philosophy as a Science. The Philosophers’ Magazine 97, pp. 30-35. 

Book chapters

Koch, S. (2022). Conceptual Engineering: Begriffe auf dem Prüfstand. In: Grouls, Niklas and Martena, Laura (Eds.), Anspruch und Methode der Philosophie. Stimmen aus der Gegenwart, WBG.

2021

Books

Dätwyler, Maria. Im Auftrag der Wahrheit, Brill/mentis, 2021. Link.

Fraisopi, Fausto. Philosophie et Demande, Garnier, 2021. Link.

Illetterati, Luca;  Miolli, Giovanna (Ed.). The Relevance of Hegel’s Concept of Philosophy, Bloomsbury, 2021. Link.

Lewin, Michael. Das System der Ideen. Zur perspektivistisch-metaphilosophischen Begründung der Vernunft im Anschluss an Kant und Fichte. Alber, 2021. Link.

Minkin, Daniel. Rationalität philosophischer Forschung, Brill/Mentis, 2021. Link

Rescher, Nicholas. Philosophy Examined, De Gruyter, 2021. Link.

Stegmaier, Werner; Werner Stegmaier: Formen philosophischer Schriften zur Einführung. Junius Verlag, 2021. Link

Articles 

Eder, A.-M. A. (2021). Explicating the Concept of Epistemic Rationality. Synthese, 199, pp. 4975–5000.

Horvath, J., Koch, S. (2021). Experimental Philosophy and the Method of Cases. Philosophy Compass 16(1), e12716. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12716

Koch, S. (2021). Why conceptual engineers should not worry about topics. Erkenntnis, online-first. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-021-00446-1

Koch, S. (2021). There is no dilemma for conceptual engineering. Reply to Max Deutsch. Philosophical Studies 178 (7), pp. 2279-2291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-020-01546-4

Koch, S., Horvath, J.(2021). Experimental philosophy and the method of cases. Philosophy Compass 16 (1). https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12716

Koch, S. (2021). The Externalist Challenge to Conceptual Engineering. Synthese 198, pp. 327–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-02007-6.

Koch, S. (2021). Engineering what? On concepts in conceptual engineering. Synthese 199 (1-2), pp. 1955-1975. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02868-w.

Lewin, M. (2021). Kant’s Metaphilosophy. Open Philosophy 4(1), pp. 292-310. https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2020-0190.

Lewin, M. (2021). Transcendental Philosophy as a Scientific Research Programme. Kantian Journal 40 (3), pp. 93-126. https://doi.org/10.5922/0207-6918-2021-3-4.

Williamson, T., Sunday-Grève, S. (2021). Philosophy and Common Sense I: What Is Common Sense? The Philosophers’ Magazine 95, pp. 24-30.

2020

Books

Gunnarsson, Logi. Vernunft und Temperament. Brill/mentis, 2020. Link.

Kann, Christoph. Die Sprache der Philosophie. Alber, 2020. Link.

Journal Issues

Philosophical Methods. Edited by Eder, A.-M., Lawler, I., van Riel, R. Synthese, 197(3), 2020. 

Articles 

Eder, A.-M., Lawler, I., van Riel, R. (2020). Philosophical methods under scrutiny: introduction to the special issue Philosophical methods. Synthese, 197(3), pp. 915-923.

Horvath, J., Wiegmann, A., Meyer, K. (2020). Intuitive Expertise and Irrelevant Options. Oxford Studies in Experimental Philosophy 3, pp. 275–310.

Reviews

Lewin, M. (2020). Theunissen, B. Hegels Phänomenologie als metaphilosophische Theorie. Hegel und das Problem der Vielfalt der philosophischen Theorien. Hamburg: Meiner 2014. Coincidentia. Zeitschrift für europäische Geistesgeschichte 11/1, pp. 292-301. ISBN: 978-3-402-18979-5.

2019

Books

Fraisopi, Fausto. Mathesis, Grund, Vernunft, Ergon, 2019. Link.

Book chapters

Koppelberg, D. (2019). Naturalistische Erkenntnistheorie. In: Grajner, Martin und Guido Melchior (Hg.), Handbuch Erkenntnistheorie. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler, pp. 391-397.

Koppelberg, D. (2019). Tugendbasierte Theorien des Wissens und Tugenderkenntnistheorie. In: Grajner, Martin und Guido Melchior (Hg.), Handbuch Erkenntnistheorie. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler, pp. 79-86.

Articles 

Lewin, M. (2019). Hegel’s Critique of Kant’s Concept of Reason. The Problem of Different Demands. Hegel-Jahrbuch 2019, pp. 146-153. https://doi.org/10.3790/hgjb.2019.1.146.

Koch, S. (2019). Carnapian explications, experimental philosophy, and fruitful concepts. Inquiry: An interdisciplinary journal of philosophy 62: 6, 700-717. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2019.1567381

Vasilyev, V. (2019). Metaphilosophy: History and Perspectives. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science 56 (2), pp. 6-18. https://doi.org/10.5840/eps201956222 

Williamson, T. (2019). Armchair Philosophy. Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 56 (2).

Reviews

Koch, S. (2019).  Herman Cappelen. Fixing Language. An Essay on the Foundations of Conceptual Engineering. Logical Analysis and the History of Philosophy 20 (1), pp. 248–256.

2018

Books

Midgley, Mary. What is Philosophy For? London: Bloomsbury, 2018. Link.

Williamson, Timothy. Doing Philosophy, Oxford University Press, 2018. Link.

Journal Issues

Meta-filosofia. Pensare la filosofia tra attività e disciplina. Edited by L. Corti, L. Illetterati and G. Miolli). Giornale di Metafisica, 2, 2018. 

Articles 

Horvath, J. (2018). Philosophical Analysis: The Concept Grounding View. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 97(3), pp. 724–750.

Lawler, I. (2018). Begriffsanalyse. Wörterbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft. de Gruyter.

Williamson, T. (2018). The Future of Philosophy. The Philosophers’ Magazine 80, pp. 101-103.

2016

Books

Fraisopi, Fausto. Philosophie und Frage (Bd.1), Alber, 2016. Link.

Fraisopi, Fausto. Philosophie und Frage (Bd. 2), Alber, 2016. Link.

Articles 

Dotson, K. (2016). Word to the Wise: Notes on a Black Feminist Metaphilosophy. Philosophy Compass, XI (2), pp. 69-74.

Horvath, J. (2016). Conceptual Analysis and Natural Kinds: The Case of Knowledge. Synthese 193(1), pp. 167–184.

Horvath, J., Wiegmann, A. (2016). Intuitive Expertise and Intuitions About Knowledge. Philosophical Studies 173(10), pp. 2701–2726.

Williamson, T. (2016). Abductive Philosophy. Philosophical Forum 47 (3-4), pp. 263-280. 

Reviews

Lawler, I. (2016). Review of the collected volume “Erkenntnistheorie – Wie und wozu?” edited by Dirk Koppelberg and Stefan Tolksdorf. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 47(2), pp. 411–415.

Articles 

Dellsén, F., Lawler, I, Norton, J. (forthcoming). Would disagreement undermine progress? Journal of Philosophy.

Horvath, J., Ziółkowski A., Wiegmann A., und Machery E., (2023). Truetemp Cooled Down: The Stability of Truetemp Intuitions. Synthese, 201, pp. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04182-7

Horvath, J., Wiegmann, A. (2023). Arguing About Thought Experiments. Synthese 201(6), pp. 217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04055-z

Edition. Horvath, J., Koch, S., Titelbaum, M. G. (forthcoming). Methods in Analytic Philosophy: A Primer and Guide. PhilPapers Foundation.

Koch, S., Löhr, G., Pinder, M.  (forthcoming). Recent work in the theory of conceptual engineering. Analysis.

Koch, S. (forthcoming). The anti-conceptual engineering argument and the problem of implementation. American Philosophical Quarterly.

Lewin, M. and Williamson, T., 2023. Kant and Analysis. Kantian Journal 42(3), pp. 49-73. http://dx.doi:10.5922/0207-6918-2023-3-3 

Minkin, D., 2023. Kant als metaphilosophischer Skeptizist? Kantian Journal 42(3), pp. 97-129. http://dx.doi:10.5922/0207-6918-2023-3-5

Lewin, M., Lewin, P. 2023. Shan, Yafeng, ed. 2022, New Directions in Metaphilosophy. Metaphilosophy 53 (2-3). pp. 153-361. Aisthesis. Pratiche, linguaggi e saperi dell’estetico 16(1), pp. 195-198. https://doi.org/10.36253/Aisthesis-1004

Book chapters

Horvath, J. (forthcoming). On the Role of Intuitions in Experimental Philosophy. In: Bauer, A. M., Kornmesser, S. (Hg.). The Compact Compendium of Experimental Philosophy. Berlin / Boston, Mass.: Walter de Gruyter, im Erscheinen.

Horvath, J. (2023). Gettier’s Thought Experiments. In: Vaidya, A., Prelevič, D. (Hg.). Epistemology of Modality and Philosophical Methodology. London: Routledge.Mit Replik von Williamson T. “Horvath on Gettier’s Thought Experiments” (ebd.).

Koch, S.,Brisen, J. (forthcoming). Conceptual Infrastructure and Conceptual Engineering. Konstanz University Press.

2015

Books

Betz, G., Koppelberg, D., Löwenstein, D. und  Wehofsits, A. (Hg.). (2015). Weiter denken – über Philosophie, Wissenschaft und Religion. Berlin: de Gruyter. Link.

Koppelberg, D., Tolksdorf S. (Hg.) (2015). Erkenntnistheorie -wie und wozu? Münster: Mentis. Link.

Book chapters

Horvath, J. (2015). Thought Experiments and Experimental Philosophy. In: Daly, C. (Hg.) The Palgrave Handbook of Philosophical Methods. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 386–418.

Horvath, J. (2015). Was ist eigentlich die Herausforderung durch die experimentelle Philosophie?. In: Koppelberg, D. & Tolksdorf, S. (Hg.). Erkenntnistheorie – wie und wozu? Paderborn: mentis, pp. 301–321.

Koppelberg, D. (2015). Brauchen wir eine neue Agenda für die Erkenntnistheorie?. In: Koppelberg, Dirk und Stefan Tolksdorf (Hg.), Erkenntnistheorie – wie und wozu?, Münster: Mentis, pp. 51-79.

Koppelberg, D. (2015). Wozu experimentelle Erkenntnistheorie?. In: Koppelberg, Dirk und Stefan Tolksdorf (Hg.), Erkenntnistheorie – wie und wozu?, Münster: Mentis, pp. 275-300.

Koppelberg, D., Tolksdorf, S. (2015). Wie und wozu Erkenntnistheorie?. In: Koppelberg, Dirk und Stefan Tolksdorf (Hg.), Erkenntnistheorie – wie und wozu?. Münster: mentis, pp. 13-47.

2014

Books

Horvath, J., Grundmann, T., Kipper, J. (2014). Die Experimentelle Philosophie in der Diskussion. Berlin: Suhrkamp. Link.

Raatzsch, Richard. Philosophiephilosophie, Springer VS, 2014. Link.

Rescher, Nicholas. Metaphilosophy, Lexington Books, 2014. Link.

Theunissen, Brendon. Hegels “Phänomenologie” als metaphilosophische Theorie. Meiner, 2014. Link.

Articles 

Horvath, J., Grundmann, T. (2014). Thought Experiments and the Problem of Deviant Realizations. Philosophical Studies 170(3), pp. 525–533.

Romizi, D., Ramharter, E. (2014). Die Philosophische Praxis – analytisch oder kontinental? Anregungen von Wittgenstein. In: S. Rinofner-Kreidl, H. Wiltsche (eds.). Analytische und Kontinentale Philosophie: Perspektiven und Methoden, Beiträge des 37. Internationalen Wittgenstein Symposiums. Kirchberg am Wechsel: Österreichische Ludwig Wittgenstein Gesellschaft.

Fraisopi, F. (2014) Komplexität und Realismus. Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy, pp. 265-279 

2013

Book

Overgaard, Søren; Gilbert, Paul; Burwood, Stephen; An Introduction to Metaphilosophy, Cambridge University Pres, 2013. Link.

Articles 

Romizi, D. (2013). War die ‘Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung’ des Wiener Kreises nicht doch auch eine Weltanschauung?. In: Stadler, F., Nemeth, E. (eds.). Die Europäische Wissenschaftsphilosophie und das Wiener Erbe. Wien & New York: Springer.

Koppelberg, D. (2013). Warum ist Gettiers Herausforderung so einflussreich und zugleich problematisch?. In: Ernst, Gerhard und Lisa Marani (Hg.), 2013. Das Gettierproblem – Eine Bilanz nach 50 Jahren. Münster: Mentis, pp. 145-177.

Williamson, T. (2013). Anti-Exceptionalism about Philosophy. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 13 (1), pp. 1-3.

Williamson, T. (2013). What is naturalism? In: Matthew C. Haug (ed.). Philosophical Methodology: The Armchair or the Laboratory?  Routledge. pp. 29.

Williamson, T. (2013). The unclarity of naturalism. In: Matthew C. Haug (ed.). Philosophical Methodology: The Armchair or the Laboratory? Routledge, pp. 36.

Reviews

Williamson, T. (2013). Horwich, P. Hegels Wittgenstein’s Metaphilosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2012. European Journal of Philosophy 21 (S2). ISBN: 978‐0‐1996‐6112‐1

Williamson, T. (2013). Alexander, J. Experimental Philosophy: An Introduction. Polity Press, 2012. Philosophy 88 (3), pp. 467-474. ISBN: 978-0745649184

2012

Books

Fraisopi, Fausto; Benoist, Jocelyn. La complexité et les phénomènes, Hermann, 2012. Link.

Horvath, J., Grundmann, T. (2012). Experimental Philosophy and Its Critics. London: Routledge. Link.

Book chapters

Koppelberg, D, (2012). The Significance of Disagreement in Epistemology. In: Jäger, Ch., Löffler, W. (eds.). Epistemology: Contexts, Values, Disagreement. Frankfurt: Ontos, pp. 305-317.

Articles

Koppelberg, D. (2012). 40 Jahre Erkenntnistheorie – Rückschau und Ausblick. Information Philosophie 200, (3/4), pp. 50-56.

.

2011

Reviews

Williamson, T. (2011). Philosophical expertise and the burden of proof. Metaphilosophy 42 (3), pp. 215-229.

2010

Books

Rescher, Nicholas; Philosophical Inquiries: An Introduction to Problems of Philosophy. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2010. Link.

Articles

Horvath, J. (2010). How (Not) to React to Experimental Philosophy. Philosophical Psychology 23(4), pp. 447–480.

Piercey, R. (2010). Metaphilosophy as First Philosophy. International Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 50, No. 3, Issue 199, pp. 335-349.

2006

Books

McIntyre, Alasdair; The Tasks of Philosophy: Selected Essays, Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. Link.

Rescher, Nicholas; Philosophical Dialectics: An Essay on Metaphilosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2006. Link.

The journal “Metaphilosophy” (since 1970) is a relevant constant source of works in metaphilosophy.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14679973

“Philpapers” is a good source for finding relevant works in metaphilosophy.

https://philpapers.org/

Both links accessed on September 4, 2024.